![]() ![]() Sussmann told congressional investigators, under oath, that the second meeting took place in February because it was delayed, not because he had collected new data. His attorneys and those representing one of the researchers who worked with Joffe have said that none of their information was gathered after Trump took office. Sussman’s lawyers have argued that it did not. The filing doesn’t make clear whether any of that data came after Trump was sworn in on Jan. ![]() 9, 2017, Sussmann "provided an updated set of allegations" to the CIA, and the indictment says the DNS data he shared ranged "from 2016 through early 2017." Joffe’s firm at the time had legal access to the data because it was providing services for the White House.ĭurham’s filing does not say that the DNS data was captured after Trump took office. Their concern was that the data showed Russian-made phones were being used from networks serving Trump Tower and the White House, among other locations. The meeting had been referenced in the original indictment and was the subject of previous reporting.Īt that meeting, Sussmann relayed that Joffe and researchers had developed other suspicions while sifting through the internet traffic data. 11 filing at the center of the most recent coverage built out the case against Sussmann, adding some details about a second meeting Sussmann had with the CIA in February 2017. Neither have Clinton or other campaign officials.ĭurham’s Feb. Joffe has not been charged with any criminal activity in the matter. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty and denied wrongdoing. Durham alleges that Sussmann told the FBI he was not there "for any client" when, the indictment says, he was actually acting on behalf of both Joffe and the Clinton campaign. The indictment Durham secured against Sussmann charged him with making a false statement when he brought this information to the FBI during a 2016 meeting. It does not reveal the content of a person’s screen or messages. The data they were parsing was domain name system, or DNS, data, which essentially tracks every time a computer or smartphone connected with a web server on the internet. They thought that some data they were analyzing may have amounted to potential evidence of a communications channel between the Trump Organization and a Russian bank. ![]() Joffe worked with a team of cybersecurity researchers who had access to internet traffic data under a pending contract with the federal government to monitor for security threats and breaches. News reporting later revealed that executive to be Rodney Joffe. In 2015, Sussmann was separately retained by another client, a technology executive, according to Sussmann’s September 2021 indictment. One of two people indicted as part of Durham’s probe is Michael Sussmann, an attorney for a law firm that represented Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. In October 2020, Trump’s attorney general, William Barr, appointed Durham to investigate how and why during the 2016 election the Justice Department decided to probe possible links between Trump and Russia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |